|
Group #3 Quest-One: Experimental-Experiential
Our scientific model suggests that we need an objective understanding of a system's precise 'mechanism of being' to fully utilize its technology.
In research we use scientific control to set up experiments and get objective, reproducible results.
Now a days, progressive scientists want to legitimize subjectivity in research as an insightful point of observation. Does this mean the researcher becomes a part of the 'experiment' as an 'experience?'
Are researchers particularly interested in showing how "psi" benefits scientific discovery or are researchers simply using scientific protocol for objectivity in observing how "psi" happens in our every day reality through intention.... or are both instances true?
Do scientists ever achieve pure objectivity realistically? Idealistically? Can objectivity be counter-intuitive? How so?
Same group-see question #2»
|
|
